Direkt zum Hauptbereich

Nadia Yassine - Interview / English

Nadia Yassine is the leader of "Justice and Spirituality", Morocco's biggest Islamist organization. She belongs to a new generation of Islamists: western-educated but not westernized. Alfred Hackensberger interviewed her

The new Moroccan family code, the "Modawwana," has been praised as an historic step towards equal rights for women in the Arab world. Are you in favor or against it?

Yassine: We were already out on the streets six years ago calling for changes to the "Modawwana," as it has long been clear to us that women must enjoy a better role in society. There are many women in our movement running projects and institutions. Take me, for example. I am the spokeswoman for our movement. We support changes, but the necessary ideas don't have to be imported from the imperialist West.

Do you regard the new law as good or bad?

Yassine: Of course, it is good and important. There is no doubt about it. I will try to make our position clear in another way. If the "Makhzen" (the governing elite in Morocco) had not been sure that we supported the new law, they wouldn't have pushed it through. We gave them clear signals of our approval. Yet, the law does not go far enough and also ignores the realities of life in Morocco today. I'll give you an example. In the countryside, there are many unregistered marriages. People there younger than 18 continue to marry, although this is forbidden under the new law.

What should be done differently?

Yassine: It is all fine and good when you tell women that they are now free. But what about unemployment, which makes it impossible for women to be independent? Economic changes are not the only thing we need. There has to be a restructuring of all sectors of society. Only then can we truly achieve something positive.

Then you want to totally change everything. It sounds like an impossible undertaking.

Yassine: It's not as impossible as it might seem. The system is blocked by the current constitution.

You mean the system of constitutional monarchy?

Yassine: Yes, as soon as this is changed, there will be economic and social progress. You can't solve individual problems without looking at the whole picture, which includes women, the economy, and education. It is all one system. Movement can only come about through a change in the constitution.

So you get rid of the monarchy, you come to power, and all the problems are then solved?

Yassine: No, it is not as easy as that. We do not want to take over power. It is a much too heavy burden to carry alone. We have to work together with all political parties and all of the other forces in society. We need each other and only together can we solve the difficult problems of our country. And this can only take place through democracy, free elections, a multi-party system, the division of powers, and an independent judiciary. The people of Morocco have a right to democracy. But first, all forces in society must work together to change the constitution.

Many don't believe you.

Yassine: I know that quite well. They'd prefer to hear that we want to set up an Iranian republic and force all women to wear headscarves.

Then you wouldn't shut down all the nightclubs and bars?

Yassine: No, bans don't work. Prohibiting alcohol won't work. You only have to turn to the USA to see that the prohibition of alcohol only brought problems. You can never achieve anything through compulsion. In contrast, you can achieve much more with democracy and education. It is better to convince people that it is in their interest not to drink alcohol and visit nightclubs.

And when education doesn't deliver the desired effects?

Yassine: We'd have to see first, but I also don't think that it would be so tragic. I simply want a just society in which people are the main concern.

Do you have a paradigm? Perhaps back to the past, to the society at the time of the Prophet Mohammed?

Yassine: The society at the time of the Prophet comes very close to how I image things. But I also find the Swiss model very interesting. It would be difficult, however, because we don't have a culture of democracy here in Morocco. We have to first develop one. And this we can only achieve together with all of the other groups in society.

Many refer to what is currently going on between East and West as the "clash of civilizations," while others call it a North-South conflict. Is it a matter of politics or religion?

Yassine: Of course it is all about politics. What takes place in the Muslim world is directly related to American imperialism, which has no interest in our religion, but in our resources, our oil. It most certainly has nothing to do with a clash of cultures, differing ideologies, belief or non-belief. We are living through a new phase of colonialism, which nowadays is referred to as the search for new markets. Oil is a curse for many countries with a majority Muslim population. This is an anti-imperialist struggle against neo-colonialism. It doesn’t matter if one is Muslim or Christian – this is a universal problem.

Imperialism and colonialism are catchwords. In concrete terms, what is it that you find so reprehensible about the politics of the West?

Yassine: I think that imperialism is based on the desire for economic supremacy and on a materialist philosophy – a vulgar Darwinism that believes only the strongest must prevail. We want to build bridges between the North and South on the basis of civil society. Today, poverty is no longer only a phenomenon of the South. There is also poverty in the North. If things continue according to the law of the jungle, then we will end up with a future marked by a universal struggle between rich and poor.

Is there an Islamic economic model – an alternative concept to capitalism that could make the world a better place for all mankind?

Yassine: I think that Islam is more all-encompassing than any other ideology. Islam is a way of being. For us, as Sufis, Islam is a spiritual state that has nothing in common with the currently prevailing capitalism. At its very beginning, Islam ruled with sense of justice over a simple merchant capitalist society. It was an economic order that cannot be compared in the slightest to today's wild liberalism, which has created a system with the hyper-rich on one side and masses of poor on the other. We are not completely against capitalism. Islam, however, can provide it with a human and just dimension.

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Geschützt, verdrängt, geduldet

Jüdisches Leben in islamischen Ländern – eine gefährdete Tradition Der durch den Nahostkonflikt genährte Antizionismus in der arabischen Welt lässt beinahe vergessen, dass auch in muslimischen Ländern jüdische Gemeinschaften leben. Allerdings hat die Abwanderung aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen oder aufgrund von politischem Druck fast überall zu einem starken Rückgang der jüdischen Bevölkerung geführt. Im jüdischen Kasino von Tanger scheint die Zeit stehengeblieben zu sein. Gut gekleidete Damen und Herren sitzen an mit grünem Filz belegten Tischen und spielen Karten. Mehrere Kronleuchter geben dem grossen Saal eine exklusive Atmosphäre. Wem nicht nach Kartenspiel zumute ist, der sitzt an der Bar und lässt sich einen Apéritif oder auch nur ein Bier servieren. Eine Abendgesellschaft im Klub, wie sie vo

Christoph Luxenberg - Interview/ English

The Virgins and the Grapes: the Christian Origins of the Koran A German scholar of ancient languages takes a new look at the sacred book of Islam. He maintains that it was created by Syro-Aramaic speaking Christians, in order to evangelize the Arabs. And he translates it in a new way by Sandro Magister That Aramaic was the lingua franca of a vast area of the ancient Middle East is a notion that is by now amply noted by a vast public, thanks to Mel Gibson’s film “The Passion of the Christ,” which everyone watches in that language. But that Syro-Aramaic was also the root of the Koran, and of the Koran of a primitive Christian system, is a more specialized notion, an almost clandestine one. And it’s more than a little dangerous. The author

Bucha was not an isolated incident - the brutal pillar of Russian military strategy

More than 400 people are said to have been murdered in the Kyiv suburb of Bucha. Some victims show signs of torture or rape. What the Russian military is doing in Ukraine is part of a perfidious strategy. A military strategy that other countries are watching closely – and copying. By Alfred Hackensberger Men who just wanted to buy bread. A family with three children who had sought shelter in the basement. Women hiding in their homes. Now they are all dead. Russian soldiers are said to have murdered them in  cold blood  in Bucha. The mayor of the town northwest of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv spoke of a total of 403 deaths. Some of the victims show signs of torture. Several women were raped. After the Russian soldiers withdrew from Bucha,  the corpses testify to a shocking sequence of violent acts  during the occupation of the city. Human rights organizations and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague are now investigating whether  war crimes  have been committed. Bucha was n